Summary:
In this article, Norman Cousins is
talking about the issue of the climate of untidiness; the situation is as he
said:” the sloppiness virus has spread to all sectors of society.”
The first
example is the change of wearing style. People nowadays like blue jeans that
are far from clean and intact, reflecting the conception of desperate conformity.
He thought what they try to do are no more than the same style they want to
keep away from. Another sloppiness takes form of speech. Cousin consider that
the tidiness of language is as important as dress, for English is one of the
best derivation in the world when it comes to linguistic treasure. Nevertheless,
not only people communicate in incoherence sentence, but also speech itself
goes beyond the slovenly to violent. The overflow of improper speech leads to
offhand attitude toward cruel-related incidents. Cousins argues that people are
becoming relentless and neglectful of all brutality and violence due to such TV
and movies.
Overall,
these phenomenon in consequence affect human relationship badly, which can be
easily found everywhere. People’s recession of emotion and overexposedness of
privacy affairs makes them senseless toward things. Finally, Cousins concludes
that he demand not for Victorian attitudes, although he wish people’s
sloppiness will disappear and go back to their own track.
Response:
Sloppiness
does make people become more arbitrary in many aspects. People speak with
segment, incoherent phrase; sometimes even use language as a weapon to insult
others. Their minds are going away from respect, worsen people’s relationship. However,
I wonder about the definition of the word “slavish”. If pursue sloppiness is really
a kind of slavish uniform, why it is?
Personally
speaking, slavish conformity means someone who doesn’t really know what they
are doing, just to follow the trend because many people are doing or elders
tells them to do so. In this case, Cousin’s thought may mainly attributes to
the phenomenon he had seen before. Moreover, the cutting-edge media affect
people hugely since they are young; violence, sex, and bloody TV or movies are
the cause to changes their minds. From these two circumstances, it seems
plausible to conclude this kind of person as slavish conformity. However,
another question comes: Can gracious things improve people’s emotion and
relationship? I think it depends. If adult people are easily affected by both
things, then the world must be promiscuous. One don’t need put on a set of rule
toward people to hope what they ought to be, not everyone inwardly share the
same thought. In addition, as soon as the sloppiness totally disappears, there
will come out another kind of sloppiness: perfectness.
People are
different, as a saying goes: “It goes all sorts to make a world.” As standpoint
diverse from person to person, we should try to judge people as a whole, not by
what they behave outwardly. It is impossible to change the world to Utopia-like
society, neither past nor future. Who knows, maybe some people in the corner
who look sloppiness, watch violent movies possess more wisdom than average
people.
The writer claim that sloppy wearing would affect people’s life in many aspect, especially the speaking and feeling toward things. People tend to use segment or incoherent phrase and become ignorant of violence, bloody TV or movies. The public even do not aware of they are in sick.
回覆刪除It is normal for people to wear tore blue jeans which they think it is fashion and watch violence, bloody programs to which they are becoming mindless. Obviously, the problems are not cause by what kind of wearing but people’s tore feeling and what is the main reason for this phenomenon? In my opinion, I think it is because of laxly strict restriction to TV and movies, so the producer will make more and more heavy content for views are gradually losing their feeling. All in all, the government has to take the responsibility toward this growing problem.
The sloppy wearing does not mean to degrade the character of people; on the other hand, the splendid wearing does not mean to up grade which of people. From the news, we see some people suicide for they can not get the newest famous brand products or steal the well-known brand’s products at the department store. The society has change their normal shape.
The government should use the power of TV or movies to educate public. They can take the advantage of their mighty influence to correct people’s value and the society would recover again.
There are more and more people becoming, as you said, “slavish.” People always have the underlying fear that they are not behaving the same, dressing the same, or even thinking the same as others. That is, most people are afraid to be considered abnormal and, which may lead to disagreement, mock and even hatred just because they are different and cannot be accepted. Nevertheless, everyone is unique and different from each other and there is no need to criticize people who are absolutely different from you. What you think is normal and neatness may be weird and unbelievable to others. There is no so-called neatness that can provide objective judgment. Take the recent vogues for example, many girls choose to wear sloppy blouses and shirts because sloppy ones are fashionable. If you wear the neat one, you will be thought of as an old-fashion guy. I am curious that if the writer of The Decline of Neatness were in our age, would he still consider the sloppy blouses as abnormal ones?
回覆刪除